A recent court case concerning Harvard’s apparent attempt to
limit the percentage of Asian Americans in their admission process has once
again brought up the topic of how incredibly competitive elite colleges have
become and how desperate parents and students are to gain admission into their
exalted realm. I think everyone is
focusing on the wrong question here.
I am a product of the so-called elite colleges with degrees
from Stanford, MIT and Georgia Tech. I
am well acquainted with the benefits of a degree from these institutions. I make this disclaimer at the outset because
I am going to take a contrarian view to the prevailing wisdom on this issue and
I believe I am qualified to do so.
The usual argument from the media, educators and businesses
when hearing anguish from students rejected from elite schools is that there
are many excellent institutions of learning and that anyway, one’s career is
not dictated by the school that one attends, but rather by the work that is
done throughout one’s career.
There is of course some truth in these common sense
platitudes. A poor performer from
Harvard will eventually be ejected from the fast track and a superstar from a
good public university (or even a poor one) will over time rise to the top of
his or her profession given a modicum of good timing and fortune.
But in my experience and in many years of observation, elite
schools do offer an amazing advantage to their fortunate graduates. The reasons are threefold – Brand, Cronyism
and Connections.
As a Stanford graduate I have found that my resume is almost
always given a second look because of the brand of the school. People who meet me are visibly impressed when
they learn that I went to Stanford or MIT.
Elite universities have spent much of their endowed billions (which, by
the way, are donated in a rather incestuous cycle by their successful graduates
for exactly this purpose) creating and polishing their brand so that the
general public, and many potential employers, are simply in awe of them. This is not to say that these institutions do
not deserve some cachet, but I am quite certain that their brand is much more
powerful than it really should be, for reasons I will point out later.
When graduates of elite universities head into the
marketplace, they are able to take advantage of a uniquely American cronyism
that is quite astonishing. Consulting
firms, financial firms, high tech firms, law schools, business schools and a
plethora of other top opportunities are doled out by executives who are graduates
of these elite schools and are typically inclined, like shadowy potentates in some
secret society, to seek out their elite brethren and offer them the choicest
entry points into the business world.
They justify this in the name of meritocracy, because who can argue
against offering elite opportunities to elite graduates?
This cronyism is one type of networking, but the benefits of
an elite pedigree do not stop there. The
multiplying effect of having both friends who have graduated with you and are
now on the yellow brick road of good fortune, as well as a network of former
and future graduates who have also been anointed in similar fashion, is quite
stunning. It creates an outsized impact
on one’s career and perpetuates itself by giving one’s children and other loved
ones similar advantages. Who can blame
you for hiring your college buddy’s daughter for that fast track position?
But it’s all ok, isn’t it?
These graduates of elite universities are the best and brightest, right? They deserve to get the best jobs and
careers. They’ve earned it.
Ah, there’s the rub that makes this a calamity of such long
life (if I may be forgiven a slight paraphrase)! There are, give or take, 325 million people
in the U.S. The Ivy League schools and
their equivalents throughout the country (Stanford, MIT, CalTech and a few
others) can admit perhaps 20,000 students each year. It has been noted on numerous occasions that
the actual admission process for these schools is the equivalent of a
lottery. There are so many qualified
applicants with amazing test scores, grades and activities that they could fill
up ten times the number of so-called ‘elite’ schools and still not have enough
spaces. By perpetuating a myth of these
elite schools having uniquely gifted students and offering a uniquely brilliant
education we have created a system that is simply another form of hereditary
privilege.
Of course this will never change. It is our uniquely American form of oligarchy
- an oligarchy that takes its form in both business and government. Is it horribly evil? No, not really. But it is unfair. However, we can all take comfort in the fact
that life and happiness are not closely related to power, wealth or business
success. The Stanford grad who is hired
by another Stanford grad at McKinsey and then fast-tracked to an all-expenses
paid MBA at Harvard three years later and then becomes a partner with a
whopping million dollar a year income may in the long run be just as miserable
as any other person on this planet who focuses their life and energy on making
money and cultivating power.
I have experienced much of this myself and have observed it
at very close quarters all my life. Did
I unduly benefit in my career from my Stanford and MIT pedigree? Well, I am actually the exception – I deserve
everything I got! 😉
Great observations. How do we break out of this vicious circle?
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with all three benefits listed especially the cronyism. I will even say that that almost ends up being the benefit that lasts the longest
ReplyDelete