In this season of eating and over-eating, I find myself once
again amused by all of the self-help offerings on dieting and eating
healthy. As a somewhat analytical
person, I find it difficult to give much credence to most of the advice.
Many people say that diet is a simple matter of intake
versus metabolic work. If you consume X
calories and the work that your body does is less than X, then you will gain
weight. If the work is more than X you
will lose weight. I have seen these
types of calculations done based on the amount of exercise one does each day. I don't buy it!
As an engineer, I think in terms of conservation of mass and
energy. Food is mass, but it is also
stored energy. Food and drink are consumed. A certain part of this food and drink is
excreted, either as urine or feces. The
amount of this excretion can vary dramatically from day to day or over longer
periods. Moreover, the amount of energy that is extracted from our food as it goes through our digestive tract may be up or down regulated based on the body's needs. The energy content of this
excretion would be important in any calculation of net energy or caloric
gains/losses. Has anyone measured this?
The body also converts part of the food and drink into
energy. The energy used by the body
might be characterized as typical daily metabolism and work (which may vary
considerably or may be fairly consistent – does anyone really know?) as well as
extra work that may be associated with exercise, stress, climate conditions and
other external phenomena.
Some of the consumed food and drink may be converted to
other forms of stored energy and deposited somewhere in the body. And conversely, some of the stored energy in
the body may be converted into energy to accomplish the work of the body. The
control functions for these mechanisms are probably poorly understood, yet they
are essential to a full understanding of the process.
Thus, there are many parameters in the diet equation –
intake, excretion, exercise rates, various forms of metabolism and their rates,
conversion rates and efficiencies, etc.
These parameters may vary dramatically from person to person and from
week to week.
Some of these parameters may be affected by the body’s
desire to maintain an equilibrium state.
For example, I have been on several cruises where I have eaten massive
quantities of rich foods. Doing a basic
energy equation of the type promoted by many diet experts would indicate that I
should be gaining weight rapidly during the 10 days or so of that cruise.
But my experience is that I gain no weight at all! I do notice that my excretion seems to be at
a markedly increased level, if I may be so indiscreet! Can it be that my body is trying to maintain
its current ‘form’? I have no doubt that
if I were to continue that type of culinary indulgence I would soon begin to
gain weight, but I am not eager to run that experiment!
I suspect that the body has a certain inertia in terms of
its weight and size. As evidenced by the
challenges facing dieters, it appears that the body fights change even when it
is not in an ideally healthy state. The
good news is that this helps us avoid ballooning every time we go through a
rough patch with food, but the bad news
is that if you are fat it may be more daunting to convince your body to stay
trim even when you are successfully cutting your calories. But in the end, if you eat less calories than
you burn (assuming you can calculate these amounts correctly!), the law of
conservation of energy will eventually favor your discipline with a good
result!
No comments:
Post a Comment